Una Gráfica sobre el Arte fantástico

Por azares del destino últimamente me han solicitado que diseñe carteles para películas, Lo que nos ha llevado a hacer una revisión de materiales ya existentes, el acostumbrado “Benchmarking” o state of the art, es decir que se esta dando hoy dia, en cuanto a carteles de Comedia Romántica, misterio, terror, documentales etc. Tanto en el ámbito nacional como internacional. Al estar explorando notamos ciertas características o patrones que saltan a la vista y surgen algunas preguntas.

¿Hay elementos (de diseño) en la composición que se manejan en forma comun? 
¿Estos elementos llevan cierto sentido expresivo o de comunicación relacinado con el genero?

¿Como los lee la audiencia? 
Se podría discetar las partes esenciales de un cartel contemporaneo
y recrearlas por medio de una aplicación electrónica?

Me encontré este análisis del Arte fantastico que se puede sintetizar en una gráfica, me pregunto si algo similar se puede hacer con algunos carteles de peliculas.

checar este artículo:

The Chart of Fantasy Art, 2009

The Chart of Fantasy Art

Every year we ask our summer intern to do a survey of cover art elements for the top fantasy novels published in the previous year. This year, our wonderful intern Jennifer looked at covers from 2009, and compared them against 2008′s findings. Over the next few days we’ll be releasing a number of charts that show what she found. After the jump, some initial observations on the data. And join us in the comments to talk about the trends.
 

1) We have concrete evidence that the big three fantasy cover clichés (“castles”, “glowy magic”, and “swords”) are in decline. The 50% reduction in castles can only mean one thing.

2) The number of dragons on covers held steady this year. The dragon population seems to be in perfect balance – but we can’t tell if that’s because new dragons are being born to replace old ones, or if last year’s dragons are just really healthy.

3) This year we didn’t spot a single unicorn (though it’s possible a unicorn was hidden under one of the hoods.) To all unicorn-lovers out there, don’t lose heart. Unicorns are rare – like double rainbows — so a year without them will only make their inevitable reappearance that much more magical. In the meantime, there’s always this.

We also introduced a few new categories this year.

1) Hooded figures: Not as many hooded figures as you might imagine, but early indications suggest that this category might explode in 2010.

2) Smoke/fog/mist: Smoke and mist are sometimes mistaken for “glowy magic”, so to ensure that “glowy magic” is accurately tracked, we introduced this category to weed out non-magical atmospheric disturbances.

3) Non-distressed damsels: We added this category because we were finding that most of the damsels gracing fantasy covers didn’t seem particularly distressed at all, and we wanted to show that. But “damsel” is too old-fashioned a term to contain the multitude of women that dominate fantasy covers. So next year we expect to retire the whole “damsel” category and replace it with categories that reflect the rise of the urban fantasy heroines – who were so numerous, various, and bad-ass we had to give them their own chart (coming later this week.)

4) Zeppelins and Dirigibles: We added this category to track the rise of steampunk and Victorian fantasy. We briefly considered “brass-goggles” and “gears” but airships seemed to be the most reliable indicators of this trend. Plus, they can be spotted at a great distance.

It should go without saying that Orbit cannot be held responsible for the accuracy of data included in the Chart of Fantasy Art, so use at your own risk.

And we’d love to know what you think in the comments. What are the trends you’re seeing in fantasy cover art? What do you want to see more or less of? Let us know!